The geopolitics of platforms: the TikTok challenge

For politicians, however, the media is a means of communication and control – particularly in periods of substantial and abrupt geopolitical tension. The paper guides scholars in conducting media-based research in the face of abrupt geopolitical tension and political interference. The media is a rich data source for IB scholars to study policy uncertainty, stakeholder attention, and issue salience. It is not journalism, but a soft-power script designed to pre-emptively frame a Tatar victory as a “democratic failure” and an Erhürman win as a “triumph.” It is a diplomatic weapon in a long-running campaign of erasure, priming its audience to judge the election not by the democratically expressed will of the Turkish Cypriot people, but by their conformity to a failed international agenda. The political relationship between Ankara and the TRNC is a strategic alliance common between guarantor and dependent states worldwide - from US influence in its allied capitals to EU diktats in Brussels.

Media smokescreens in geopolitics

The United Kingdom has also proposed regulations that would allow the government to fine companies for hosting harmful content and false information. Furthermore, unless social media companies change their business models that rely on algorithms that perpetuate hate speech, which is unlikely, the problem will persist. For example, Facebook deleted accounts of Palestinians and pro-Palestine activists at the direction of the Israeli government and its flawed definitions of incitement,26 virtually allowing repressive regimes to censor and silence the narratives of marginalized, oppressed, and powerless communities. While instituting some accountability among social media firms is important, making them the sole gatekeepers of information remains problematic. Social media companies, especially Facebook, have come under intense scrutiny in the last few years for their role in amplifying political divisions, fake news, privacy violations, and violent conflict. In order to remedy the negative and damaging effects of social media in fanning the flames of division and conflict, the roots of the problem must be addressed.

  • Although this phenomenon came to the attention of many Western observers only after successful Russian interference in the 2016 US election, non-Western states have invested in digital influence capabilities for more than a decade.
  • To achieve this, the particle size and composition of the smokes has to be adjusted.
  • And, even in the past four months with all the talk of the Fed “retreating” on QE and going “dovish”, Fed bankers still claim in their public statements that the US economy is enjoying a “solid” recovery.
  • The study rejected its hypothesis, which suggested that social media had a positive impact on economic growth .

Description of DEFCON ZERQ Ep. 018: Global Smokescreens & the Deep State Energy War

In other words, TikTok might be used to further empower China in geopolitical relations between the two states. While the Chinese government has been known to influence the content available on Douyin, the evidence of similar influence on TikTok is limited. What the TikTok controversy reveals is the extent to which the politics of platforms is immersed in geopolitical tensions between the US and China. They are reflective of the well established politics of platforms, which feature controversies over data security and user privacy (Isaak & Hanna, 2018), content moderation (Gillespie, 2018), and the regulation of speech (Balkin, 2017). By placing the recent contestation over TikTok within its geopolitical context, we improve understanding of key political motivations driving this platform controversy and the resulting policy responses. Up to this point, this realm of geopolitics has largely mirrored that of the physical environment—the US has dominated economically and culturally across large regions of the digital environment (Gray, 2020).

Media Hub

Media smokescreens in geopolitics

The humanitarian crises in countries of the global South are either fleetingly covered or ignored in global news and as casino1 the European theatre again takes centre stage. This chapter reflects on the dimensions that a novel research agenda should include to allow the rerouting of geopolitics. Using a conceptualisation based on narratives, this think-piece explores the intersections between geopolitics and communications. This period has seen a diverse range of voices in international broadcasting, indicating a multipolar flow of information.

Reference supports the claim of reference regarding data breaches and the need for better regulations regarding the usage of data. Reference also states a similar observation regarding information spread and geopolitics. Furthermore, the study presents three key points that state what organizations can do to have better political risk management; these points can be used by multiple entities for achieving a good political risk management program based on long-term thinking. This has been deemed as being negative in the study of as the intentions of some politicians may not be in line with those of the individuals being influenced.

Media smokescreens in geopolitics

Additionally, the popular uprisings that swept the region in 2011 were born out of political and economic marginalization and social inequality as well as brutal crackdowns on opposition movements. In Arab countries, identity-based conflict continues to reemerge and be reshaped by shifting geopolitical agendas. On the other hand, shifts brought on by globalization have increased identity politics on the right, especially among middle-class white populations, leading to resentments over perceived lost economic opportunities, affronted dignities, and threats to status, lifestyle, and even existence. These have flooded media and political conversations not only in the United States but around the world. The intersection of identity politics and social media provides a potential for devastating consequences, especially in relation to human rights and democracy. “Imagined geopolitics” in the Russian media discourse on coronavirus.

Media smokescreens in geopolitics

His seemingly innocuous sports commentary briefly made him a US social media celebrity.70Joseph A. As Iranian policymakers sought new ways to defend against foreign influence and shift to the information offensive, their attention would inevitably turn to the Internet. In 2015, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned an assembled group of IRGC commanders that “economic and security infiltration” was less a threat than “intellectual, cultural, and political infiltration.”40Robinson, “Modern Political Warfare,” 127.

The Chinese government advised TikTok to “seriously and cautiously” review the rules and consider their implication for the intended US sale (Xiao & Lin, 2020, para. 5). This proves once again that "freedom and security" is nothing more than an excuse for some US politicians to pursue gunboat diplomacy in the digital age. Even a CIA assessment says there's no evidence that China intercepted TikTok data or used the app to bore into cell phones. Spokesperson Lijian also emphasised the strong foundations TikTok already has in the US, pointing to the senior TikTok staff who are US citizens, TikTok’s US operations including company servers and data centres, and hundreds of American employees (Lijian, 2020b). The Chinese government similarly voiced opposition to the executive orders. https://defensereview.com/breaking-news-pinnacle-armor-dragon-skin-vs-interceptor-body-armor-fights-on/ The order specified that the prohibition was necessary in the context of a national emergency relating to “the spread in the United States of mobile applications developed and owned by companies in the People’s Republic of China” (Trump, 2020d, para. 2).

No Comments Yet.

Leave a comment